[Bug 454668] Review Request: gupnp-vala - vala bindings for gupnp

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454668





--- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>  2009-01-20 09:48:45 EDT ---

> gupnp-vala.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/vala/vapi/gssdp-1.0.deps
> gupnp-vala.x86_64: E: no-binary
> gupnp-vala-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package
> 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings.
> 
> I think the first & third errors are real ones which
> need to be looked at.  Not sure about the 'no-binary'
> error.

I've queried the first one upstream and awaiting a response but I'm not sure
whether the 3rd one is actually an issue as vala actually generates C code
which is then compiled do I don't think language bindings would generate
executable code and hence there wouldn't be any debuginfo. See
http://live.gnome.org/Vala/ for basic details. As I can't see any vala specific
guidelines at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines I'm going to
query fedora-devel

> - license matches the actual package license
> 
> No, the license is LGPLv2+

I've fixed this locally but I haven't put up a new version until I've
fixed/clarified the others above.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]