Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454668 --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-01-20 09:48:45 EDT --- > gupnp-vala.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/vala/vapi/gssdp-1.0.deps > gupnp-vala.x86_64: E: no-binary > gupnp-vala-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package > 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings. > > I think the first & third errors are real ones which > need to be looked at. Not sure about the 'no-binary' > error. I've queried the first one upstream and awaiting a response but I'm not sure whether the 3rd one is actually an issue as vala actually generates C code which is then compiled do I don't think language bindings would generate executable code and hence there wouldn't be any debuginfo. See http://live.gnome.org/Vala/ for basic details. As I can't see any vala specific guidelines at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines I'm going to query fedora-devel > - license matches the actual package license > > No, the license is LGPLv2+ I've fixed this locally but I haven't put up a new version until I've fixed/clarified the others above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review