Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226210 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 --- Comment #12 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-01-19 15:54:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Sorry to bother you again, but, please, provide more explanations - it still > not clear for some people, whether iLBC legal or not. > > Opal ships this implementation of RFC3951 ( http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3951 > ), which distributes under very strange license: > > http://www.ilbcfreeware.org/documentation/gips_iLBClicense.pdf > > See also this thread: > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/90195 > > We already removed iLBC support from Asterisk - can we re-add this support > back? Sorry for the delay. Red Hat Legal got this one wrong (it happens to everyone sometimes). The iLBC codec needs to be removed from the opal tarball. Reblocking FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review