Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-01-18 09:25:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Sorry for the delay... Yes, I read everything and have some things already > solved, other still pending. > > I wanted to ask you about some small doubts: > > 1) Until now, I'm building rpms/srpms by invoking: "rpmbuild -ta > TARBALL.tar.gz", where the .spec file is inside the tarball. I guess this is > not the best practice, since any change in the spec file requires an update of > the whole tarball. I've read the rpmbuild manpage but not found a command such > as "rpmbuild -ta TARBALL.tar.gz <SOME-FLAG> mrpt.spec" which allows me to > provide the spec file separately. Any ideas about this? - Please use $ rpmbuild -ba foo.spec . > 2) "Package-splitting: First of all, please explain why you want to split each > library into different subpackges." I understand here the splitting into > "mrpt-XXX" library packages, right? - Yes. > My intention is to separate dependencies, > so an application (in a future package) might require only a subset of the > libs. Do you want me to explicitly explain this in comments in the spec file? - Please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review