Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480050 --- Comment #3 from Debarshi Ray <debarshi.ray@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-01-16 14:58:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > - Local build fails with: > gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector > --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -o .libs/libchamplain-scan > .libs/libchamplain-scan.o > -pthread -Wl,--export-dynamic -lgdk-x11-2.0 -lclutter-cairo-0.8 > -lclutter-glx-0.8 -lpangocairo-1.0 -lgthread-2.0 -lrt -lgdk_pixbuf_xlib-2.0 > -lpango-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lcairo > -lsoup-2.4 -lgio-2.0 -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -lglib-2.0 > ../../champlain/.libs/libchamplain-0.2.so -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/lib64 > creating libchamplain-scan > gtk-doc: Running scanner libchamplain-scan > Scan failed: > make[2]: *** [scan-build.stamp] Error 255 > make[2]: Leaving directory > `/home/s4504kr/rpmbuild/BUILD/libchamplain-0.2.8/docs/reference' > make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/s4504kr/rpmbuild/BUILD/libchamplain-0.2.8' > make: *** [all] Error 2 It is strange, but I tried this on an updated Fedora 10 x86_64 system and on Koji against the dist-f11 tag and both passed. Here is the relevant portion from a rpmbuild on my Fedora 10 x86_64 system: [...] gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -o .libs/libchamplain-scan .libs/libchamplain-scan.o -pthread -Wl,--export-dynamic -lgdk-x11-2.0 -lclutter-cairo-0.8 -lclutter-glx-0.8 -lpangocairo-1.0 -lgthread-2.0 -lrt -lgdk_pixbuf_xlib-2.0 -lpango-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lcairo -lsoup-2.4 -lgio-2.0 -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -lglib-2.0 ../../champlain/.libs/libchamplain-0.2.so -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/lib64 creating libchamplain-scan gtk-doc: Running scanner libchamplain-scan touch scan-build.stamp gtk-doc: Rebuilding template files [...] Which version of Fedora did you try? > ToDO. > > you can wrote > > %{_includedir}/%{name}-0.2/ > > [...] > > and > > %{_datadir}/champlain/ Actually, I do not do that with directories created by the package to avoid being suprised by the addition or removal of an important sub-directory in a new upstream release. In a way this is merely a personal preference which I follow in almost all my packages. I hope that it goes well with the guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review