Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-01-16 13:45:02 EDT --- Well, currenly I make this package blocked by FE-Legal This package itself is under GPLv2+, however - This package also depends (BRs) on skinlf and l2fprod-common - skinlf (bug 469471, already imported into Fedora) is under "ASL 2.0 and zlib and ASL 1.1" - I checked l2fprod-common (bug 475017) and actually this is under "ASL 2.0 and ASL 1.1" - And ASL 1.1 is not compatible with GPLv2+: see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing So: - Would you ask l2fprod-common upstream to relicense all files under ASL 1.1 to ASL 2.0? - And also would you ask skinlf upstream to do so? By the way ASL 1.1 is this: http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-1.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review