Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467391 --- Comment #3 from Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-01-16 04:54:34 EDT --- $ rpmlint Download/mingw32-gdbm-1.8.0-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/mingw32-gdbm-1.8.0-1.fc10.noarch.rpm mingw32-gdbm.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw32-gdbm.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/gdbm.h mingw32-gdbm.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgdbm.la mingw32-gdbm.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgdbm.dll.a mingw32-gdbm.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgdbm.dll.a mingw32-gdbm.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgdbm.dll.a mingw32-gdbm.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 5 warnings. Looks like false positives, because of the cross compiler nature of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review