Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: unalz - Decompression utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480249 Summary: Review Request: unalz - Decompression utility Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ReportedBy: oget.fedora@xxxxxxxxx QAContact: extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx CC: notting@xxxxxxxxxx, fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/unalz.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/unalz-0.63-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Unalz is a utility to decompress .alz files. It supports bzip2/raw format transformation, splitting the compressed file into smaller chunks (alz, a00, a01, ...), extract password protected .alz files, and CRC checks. rpmlint is silent. I had submitted this package before (bug# 477106) but it got rejected because (with the help of friends at #fedora-devel) we figured that the project webpage said: - it is free as in cost, but you are prohibited from on commercial distribution in magazines or CD - it allows distribution only unmodified and patches must be distributed separately. And the tarball did not contain a license file. Now all of these issues seem resolved. The tarball contains a zlib license and the non-free clauses at the project webpage [1] are replaced via zlib license [2]. This package still might have a patent issue (although I couldn't find one) because it is a decompressor of the commercial compressor Alzip [3]. It should be checked by FE-LEGAL to verify that it's OK to distribute this on Fedora. [1] http://www.kipple.pe.kr/win/unalz/ [2] http://www.kipple.pe.kr/etc/zlib_license/ [3] http://www.altools.com/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review