Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225735 Robert Scheck <redhat@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx Blocks| |182235 --- Comment #5 from Robert Scheck <redhat@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-01-15 16:25:02 EDT --- I signed up for co-maintainer as Jeff seems to be AWOL. Looks like he's maybe a better upstream maintainer rather a downstream one - sorry Jeff. When looking around in Red Hat Bugzilla for open bug reports, I also had a look to upstream version control system in order to gather maybe some patches solving mentioned issues or even referenced fixes being not in Fedora: git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/network/ethtool/ethtool.git Unluckily, I've now to add a FE_LEGAL blocker as Jeff was somehow so nice to remove *any* hint how ethtool is now licensed after version 6. And the only license hint in this clone seems to be just the man page - which is referring in a comment, that the man page itself (and just the man page) is licensed as "GNU Public License." - could be a mislabeled GPL. So: Tom, your turn first before continuing with something else in this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review