[Bug 467376] Review Request: mingw32-pixman - MinGW Windows Pixman library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467376





--- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx>  2009-01-15 08:33:18 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Mostly OK. Needs a license file. I'm not quite sure what the
> make-pixman-snapshot.sh script is used for. Its not packaged nor used during
> the build process that I can see. I presume it must be for creating a
> git/svn/cvs snapshot, which AFAICT we're not using a snapshot so does it need
> to be included.

That file is from the base Fedora pixman package.  I just included
it so that we keep as close to the base package as possible.  It's
not used currently in the base package either.

> It also doesn't currently build in koji but that's expected due
> to the lack of mingw32-dlfcn. It does build without it though. I'm not sure
> whether mingw32-dlfcn is currently being reviewed. Its got input on the ticket
> but nobody currently has ownership of it.

I'm hoping that Adel Gadllah will have a look at mingw32-dlfcn
(bug 478640) soon.

> + rpmlint output
> 
> $ rpmlint -i mingw32-pixman-0.13.2-1.fc10.src.rpm 
> mingw32-pixman.src: W: strange-permission make-pixman-snapshot.sh 0775
> A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions.
> Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions.
> 
> 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

Not sure what rpmlint is complaining about here :-)
It's a shell script, in the SRPM, (potentially) used to
build the package, so I don't think this is incorrect.

> - %doc includes license file

This is annoying isn't it.  Upstream don't provide a license
file and the base Fedora package doesn't include one either.

I've raised the following bug upstream:
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19582

Below is a new build which preemptively includes this
patch.

Spec URL:
http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/pixman/mingw32-pixman.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-pixman-0.13.2-2.fc10.src.rpm

* Thu Jan 15 2009 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> - 0.13.2-2
- Include LICENSE file (freedesktop bug 19582).

$ rpm -qlp
/home/rjones/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/mingw32-pixman-0.13.2-2.fc11.noarch.rpm
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/libpixman-1-0.dll
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/pixman-1
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/pixman-1/pixman-version.h
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/pixman-1/pixman.h
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libpixman-1.dll.a
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libpixman-1.la
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/pixman-1.pc
/usr/share/doc/mingw32-pixman-0.13.2
/usr/share/doc/mingw32-pixman-0.13.2/LICENSE

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]