Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479983 --- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-01-14 21:27:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Bad: > - Main package contains no Provides for mew-common Thank you for catching this up. fixed. > - subpackage el don't contains any Obsoletes/Provides statements Does -el subpackage really need Obsoletes/Provides statements? I suppose it should works since it requires emacs-mew which do obsolete/provide old package. > - you man name the subpacke wiht 'el' insteat of '-n %{name}-el' Indeed. just followed a template in Emacs packaging policy. fixed. Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/emacs-mew/emacs-mew.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/emacs-mew/emacs-mew-6.2-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review