Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225725 --- Comment #13 from Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> 2009-01-14 08:55:35 EDT --- I withdrawn from Fedora, but I can still make evil comments ;-). The versionned Obsoletes doesn't looks good to me. The Obsolete version should be the old links version, not the elinks version. So could be along Obsoletes: links < 1:0.97 Provides: links <= 1:0.97-1 though I didn't found a full list of old links rpm in RHEL or fedora this seems to be fine, since as you said above 0.96 was the latest packages and upstream is already at 0.99 or 1.00pre. Otherwise, I am fine with keeping the symlink as long as links is not brought back in fedora. Once it is in, maybe using alternatives would be better. And I am also fine with using links2 for the links 2 package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review