Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479793 --- Comment #5 from Conrad Meyer <konrad@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-01-14 02:29:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > ... > I think better to move it to ghc-cpphs where it actually applies Done. (Or I guess, your patch does this.) Although rpmbuild complains as I told you on IRC. > ... > [=] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. > > Hmm, /usr/share/doc/ghc/libraries is owned by ghc-doc but not required by > ghc-cpphs - looks like a oversight of the guidelines. > > Wondering whether we should subpackage haddock docs for this or do something > else. Well, at any rate ghc-cpphs must depend on ghc-doc (or ghc-doc if we create a subpackage for the docs). > ... > I sent a message to the maintainer asking for the GPL license file to be added > in the future. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review