Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225608 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #24 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-01-13 21:01:51 EDT --- Honestly, the decision about whether this package should die or not has no bearing on whether what is currently in the distro is packaged correctly. We can't treat it like a regular package and refuse to allow it in; it's already in, and the purpose of this ticket is to ensure that the packaging is OK. The packaging is obviously OK; the package has nothing substantive save Requires(Pre): setup filesystem name, version, license, summary, description, buildroot, changelog, are all OK. There's no source to check, no files to inspect. As such I'm going to approve it. Sure, it would be nice if it was killed off, but we could certainly find worse-packaged pieces of historical cruft in the distro. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review