Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226519 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-01-13 18:08:05 EDT --- It's been quite some time since my previous comments, and some of it seems to be out of date when compared to the current state of the package. There's now an upstream URL and released source tarball. The WITH_SELINUX stuff is gone now. COPYING is now included. Most of the above rpmlint stuff is still there. Additionally there are some bogus "no-dependency-on" complaints about the debuginfo package, which might be a bug in rpm but isn't an issue with this package. So we're left with: No need for the SysVinit conflict; even RH9 has SysVinit 2.84. Similarly, you can drop some of the versions from the dependencies, as we don't support any releases with such old versions of libselinux-devel or pam. Why does this have a direct dependency on /etc/pam.d/system-auth? It's been provided by the pam package as far back as the oldest machine I can access (RH 7.2). usermode.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/security/console.apps/halt usermode.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/security/console.apps/poweroff usermode.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/security/console.apps/reboot I'm not sure what to do with these. If they're really configuration files then they need to nave %noreplace so updates don't overwrite local changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review