Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 --- Comment #64 from Lorenzo Villani <lvillani@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-01-13 10:27:13 EDT --- ETL is an header-only package, why split in ETL and ETL-devel? I've been told that you can proceed either way but I think that having only ETL is better. By the way: are you a sponsored packager (I couldn't find you in the packager group). If not, you'll have to wait a sponsor to step in and review the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review