Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 Ankur Sinha <sanjay_ankur@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(sanjay_ankur@yaho | |o.co.in) | --- Comment #18 from Ankur Sinha <sanjay_ankur@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-01-13 03:57:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #15) > > > The new spec template says "change *.ttf to where your files actually are". I > > dint quite get that. > > You did ok, I've tried to clarify the wiki page ping me if it's still unclear > > > Also, rpmlint for the rpm gives this warning.. : "cf-bonveno-fonts.noarch: W: > > symlink-should-be-relative /etc/fonts/conf.d/60-cf-bonveno.conf > > /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/60-cf-bonveno.conf" > > This is an rpmlint of dubious utility that will be discussed by FPC soonish. In > the meanwhile, ignore it > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Absolute_symlinks_in_fonts_templates_%282009-01-02%29 > > Please make your fontconfig file adhere more closely to the basic template in > fontpackages-devel. > > Otherwise, everything else seems fine hi, I have the package installed. I dont know the location of the templates :( . Can you tell me where these are located? I was still referring to the ones i had downloaded earlier. regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review