Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477526 Michael Stahnke <mastahnke@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mastahnke@xxxxxxxxx --- Comment #5 from Michael Stahnke <mastahnke@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-01-12 22:45:18 EDT --- rpmlint rpmlint SRPMS/rubygem-hpricot-0.6.164-2.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/rubygem-hpricot-0.6.164-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/rubygem-hpricot-doc-0.6.164-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm rubygem-hpricot-doc.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. 1ad4f33559a0c41fb7e4a2d4eb43f3b7 hpricot-0.6.164.gem (Matches upstream -- this is good) ext/fast_xs/FastXsService.java: -- Looks like Apache license, also boingboing samples are CC licenesed. Not sure how one package handled multiple liceneses. Outside of that, I think it looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review