Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-01-12 17:39:43 EDT --- So, just to be clear... this is content that is only useful with proprietary applications, right? There is no relevant guideline to match this. Our emulator policy is the inverse (you can include the FOSS emulator, if there are FOSS ROMS). I think this needs to go to FESCo for review (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Code_Vs_Content): "All content is subject to review by FESCo, who has the final say on whether or not it can be included." I'll put this on FESCo's radar. For what it is worth, I support including this FOSS licensed content, as it "enhances the OS user experience" has "an open source compatible license", and is not "legally questionable", the main three barriers for content inclusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review