Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgeotiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178162 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx 2006-08-08 10:39 EST ------- The debian maintainer response: This is relevant. I would move those data into a non-free package a part. That would involve re-packaging the upstream tarball, of course. Maybe the best thing to do at that point would be to contact the upstream and ask them to precise their licence. Otherwise some split should be needed. (isn't there a bug to block in such cases, like FE-LEGAL?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review