[Bug 477338] Review Request: php-pecl-imagick - Provides a wrapper to the ImageMagick library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477338


Remi Collet <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




--- Comment #4 from Remi Collet <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  2009-01-11 02:52:35 EDT ---
REVIEW:

+ rpmlint (see comment)
php-pecl-imagick.i386: I: checking
php-pecl-imagick.i386: E: zero-length
/usr/share/doc/php-pecl-imagick-2.2.1/INSTALL
php-pecl-imagick.i386: E: zero-length
/usr/share/doc/php-pecl-imagick-2.2.1/TODO
php-pecl-imagick.src: I: checking
php-pecl-imagick-debuginfo.i386: I: checking
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings.
+ package name ok
+ specfile name ok
+ license Ok (PHP)
+ spec in english
+ source ok
c205ff5e38ca88aad01e74ea8d0e3816  imagick-2.2.1.tgz
+ source URL ok
+ latest stable version
+ build ok (i386, x86_64, ppc and ppc64)
+ build ok in mock (F9, F10, devel)
+ BR ok for fedora
+ no locale
+ own all directories ok
+ perm ok
+ clean ok
+ contain code ok
+ doc small enough
+ doc not required to run
+ no devel
+ no gui
+ install start with rm buildroot
+ Final Requires 
/bin/sh  
/usr/bin/pecl  
config(php-pecl-imagick) = 2.2.1-2.fc11
libMagickCore.so.1  
libMagickWand.so.1  
libc.so.6  
php(api) = 20041225
php(zend-abi) = 20060613
- Final Provides not ok (see MUST)
config(php-pecl-imagick) = 2.2.1-2.fc11
imagick.so  
php-pecl-imagick = 2.2.1-2.fc11
+ package.xml is V2 (registration ok)


SHOULD:
- TODO is provided empty by upstream, so i think it's ok (could be not empty in
another version)

- INSTALL is also empty but generally provides information about "building from
source" which is not usefull with RPM. You should probably remove it (some
package keep it, some remove it)

- add version in BR (ok for all fedora but EPEL 4 don't have requirement)
BuildRequires: php-devel >= 5.1.3, php-pear, ImageMagick-devel >= 6.2.4

- setup the -n option is needless when -c used

- add conditional (recommended in PHP Guidelines)
  %post => %if 0%{?pecl_install:1}
  %postun => %if 0%{?pecl_uninstall:1}
Without, you package couldn't be imported in EPEL-5 (macro not defined in old
php-pear, but even "pecl install" don't work => no extension registration in
this case)

MUST:
- add the missing virtual provides (from PHP guidelines)
Provides:     php-pecl(%peclName)


Only the "MUST" must be fixed for approval, but SHOULD need your attention.

Do you want to maintain thi package in EPEL ?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]