Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 --- Comment #16 from Christoph Wickert <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-01-10 14:20:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > Yes I did. You can choose not to believe me of course. The review guidlines include the packaging guidelines and at least the latter are not met. > Here's the output of rpmlint here : > backup-manager.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.7.7-3 > ['0.7.7-3.fc10', '0.7.7-3.fc10'] > Which is completely useless. You are supposed to run rpmlint on _all_packages, not only the binaries. $ rpmlint /home/chris/Desktop/backup-manager-0.7.7-3.fc10.src.rpm backup-manager.src: W: strange-permission backup-manager-0.7.7.tar.gz 0770 backup-manager.src: W: strange-permission backup-manager.spec 0770 backup-manager.src: W: strange-permission backup-manager.cron.daily 0770 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. Hint: You should also run rpmlint on the installed package, because some errors are not detected otherwise. > It's nice however that you found out about the binary dependencies. This is IMO also part of the review guidelines. P.S.: I know I am pedantic ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review