Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: db4o https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201551 ------- Additional Comments From rpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-08-08 07:16 EST ------- Ok, upon further reading I see that you're right about %{_libdir}, though the guidelines say it is a temporary solution. However, you still haven't addressed my concerns about installing a precompiled binary. In particular, /usr/lib/mono/gac/db4o/*/db4o.dll (installed) is binary identical to db4o-5.5/dll/db4o.dll (shipped). The guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Mono#head-1d3454f431ec1c8761eb46582e7f66bbddc1fd08 say explicitly that "All packages must build from source". And I'd like you to name the docs package db4o-doc, not db4o-docs, as this naming seems to be more common among extras packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review