[Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504





--- Comment #4 from Ant Bryan <anthonybryan@xxxxxxxxx>  2009-01-08 18:31:40 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > I also added the Epiphany extension with a
> > BuildRequires: epiphany-devel
> > 
> > but without a
> > Requires: epiphany
> > 
> > is that the correct way to do it?
> 
> Nope. You should make a subpackage for the epiphany extension. Please have a
> look at my gwget spec if you need help with this:
> http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/gwget/F-10/gwget.spec?view=markup

Thank you, that more than helps! I've borrowed heavily from it. :)

Spec URL: http://pastebin.ca/1303914
SRPM URL: http://www.metalinker.org/mirrors/gget/gget-0.0.4-3.fc10.src.rpm

Here is what rpmlint reports
gget.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gconf/schemas/gget.schemas
gget-epiphany-extension.noarch: W: no-documentation
gget-epiphany-extension.noarch: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.

The bad news: gget will not run for me now, either this new rpm or the old ones
I made. I updated my system today, I wonder if that's the cause.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]