Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 --- Comment #4 from Ant Bryan <anthonybryan@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-01-08 18:31:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > I also added the Epiphany extension with a > > BuildRequires: epiphany-devel > > > > but without a > > Requires: epiphany > > > > is that the correct way to do it? > > Nope. You should make a subpackage for the epiphany extension. Please have a > look at my gwget spec if you need help with this: > http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/gwget/F-10/gwget.spec?view=markup Thank you, that more than helps! I've borrowed heavily from it. :) Spec URL: http://pastebin.ca/1303914 SRPM URL: http://www.metalinker.org/mirrors/gget/gget-0.0.4-3.fc10.src.rpm Here is what rpmlint reports gget.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gconf/schemas/gget.schemas gget-epiphany-extension.noarch: W: no-documentation gget-epiphany-extension.noarch: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. The bad news: gget will not run for me now, either this new rpm or the old ones I made. I updated my system today, I wonder if that's the cause. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review