[Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108





------- Additional Comments From paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx  2006-08-08 05:22 EST -------
The question is: are these files docs or are they data? I don't know in this
specific instance because I don't know the package, but many apps with GUI front
ends have built-in ways to access their docs, which are expected to be in the
place they're configured with. Marking them as %doc and/or moving them elsewhere
could cause this built-in means of accessing the docs to fail, which would
violate the rule:

  MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime
  of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run
  properly if it is not present.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]