Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226510 --- Comment #11 from Harald Hoyer <harald@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-01-08 09:05:21 EDT --- > rpmlint with udev-135-3 of rawhide: > > udev.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/modprobe.d/floppy-pnp > A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A > way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: > %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here this file contains an alias which is missing in the kernel > > udev.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%trigger rm > udev.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%trigger rm rm is really needed > udev.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/udev-post > The service is enabled by default after "chkconfig --add"; for security > reasons, most services should not be. Use "-" as the default runlevel in the > init script's "chkconfig:" line and/or remove the "Default-Start:" LSB keyword > to fix this if appropriate for this service. this service is _always_ needed > > udev.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/udev-post > The service is enabled by default after "chkconfig --add"; for security > reasons, most services should not be. Use "-" as the default runlevel in the > init script's "chkconfig:" line and/or remove the "Default-Start:" LSB keyword > to fix this if appropriate for this service. this service is _always_ needed > > udev.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name udev-post > The init script name should be the same as the package name in lower case, or > one with 'd' appended if it invokes a process by that name. ok, I screwed up, when I named the service > > libudev-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on libudev/libudev-libs/liblibudev > 7 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings. the devel package depends on libudev0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review