[Bug 459946] Review Request: pfscalibration - Scripts and programs for photometric calibration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459946





--- Comment #12 from Ulrich Drepper <drepper@xxxxxxxxxx>  2009-01-07 04:00:40 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> The compiler should be called with the full set of %{optflags} or the resulted
> debuginfo package will be broken.

The flags provided are used.  There are just some additional flags passed. 
Nothing got broken.

Anyway, I have changed it slightly, similar to the way it is done in the pfstmo
package.  I'm now replacing the -O2 option only with some additional options
for higher optimization.  These higher optimizations are appropriate in this
case.

> Please also include COPYING file in the %doc section of the package.
> It would be also nice to add README files, ChangeLog and AUTHORS.

I did that.

The resulting files are here:

Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/drepper/pfscalibration.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/drepper/pfscalibration-1.4-3.fc10.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]