Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226568 --- Comment #16 from Ondrej Vasik <ovasik@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-01-06 05:50:37 EDT --- Email to Eric - he is ok with GPLv2+, so will change it in next xmlto release: Ondřej Vašík <ovasik@xxxxxxxxxx>: > Hello, > I'm Fedora(and since 0.0.19 upstream) maintainer of xmlto. > During review of xmlto > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226568) Till Maas brought > up question about xmlif license. It seems that xmlif has GPL+ license, > but xmlto has GPLv2+ license. Therefore I have to use License: GPL+ and > GPLv2+ as the current license for xmlto. Are you ok with having xmlif > under GPLv2+ to consolidate it with xmlto? > > Thanks in advance for answer. > > Greetings, > Ondrej Vasik Yes, go ahead. -- <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a> -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review