Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 Jens Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jfearn@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-01-05 19:55:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > *ERROR: Brand fedora is not installed* > Either install fedora or change to a valid Brand. > Installed Brands: echo common > make: *** [pre] Error 1 Presumably "BuildRequires: publican-fedora" is required. (In reply to comment #5) > - Changelog entries are still missing. IN PROGRESS (PUBLICAN BROKEN) Fabian is referring to the spec file changelog entries. > - Source0 WE ARE DEVELOPING THIS DOCUMENT. You should still publish an url (preferred) or explain in the spec file how it is generated: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL (In reply to comment #6) > Latest version... > > Spec URL: > http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/fedora-Linux_Security_Guide-10-en-US.spec > SRPM URL: > http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/fedora-Linux_Security_Guide-10-en-US-1.0-4.src.rpm I think you don't need the 10 in the package name. Presumably you are not planning to have a new fedora-Linux_Security_Guide-11-en-US in F11, etc? I still liked fedora-security-guide or linux-security-guide. Once translations are available presumably they would go into separate source packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review