Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475055 --- Comment #6 from Conrad Meyer <konrad@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-01-01 16:07:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > However, LICENSE only says this: > > """ > > The manual for Gfan is NOT distributed under the GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE. > > The manual may be freely redistributed but is not allowed to be changed. > > The manual may be removed from the software package. > > """ > > > > Does that violate Fedora guidelines? I don't think so. > > "The manual is not allowed to be changed" is definitely non-free, > so this part cannot be in Fedora: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ """ Does Fedora permit anything under "Non-Free" licensing? When it comes to software or fonts, the answer is definitely no. We strongly prefer that items classified as content (see Code Vs Content) are under a Free license, but we only require that they be freely distributable without restrictions. """ I think a manual is content as opposed to code and therefore freely distributable is ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review