[Bug 433398] Review Request: synbak - Synbak Universal Backup System (first package, need sponsor)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433398





--- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  2009-01-01 09:25:48 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Hi Jon - there doesn't seem to be any requirement in the sponsorship guidelines
> that a new contributor must perform a few unofficial reviews before being
> sponsored. I agree that it is desirable, but it doesn't seem to be mandatory?

See:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored#Sponsorship_model
Actually it depends on the judgment of the people who is going to
sponsor the new contributors. However for my case I always request
new contributors to either submit anothere review request or do a pre-review
of other person's review request, especially because
- after getting sponsored he/she now can formally approve other person's
  review request
- and the new contributor has to _maintain_ his/her packages on Fedora
  (of course the sponsor must support him/her, however basically
   it should be done by him/herself).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]