[Bug 478398] Review Request: httping - Ping alike tool for http requests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478398


manuel wolfshant <wolfy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |wolfy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




--- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  2008-12-30 08:18:28 EDT ---
Unfortunately your attempt to override the default CFLAGS fails, in
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1024704&name=build.log you
can see the following fragment:

+ CFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions
-fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64
 -mtune=generic -I/usr/kerberos/include'
+ DEBUG=
+ make -j4
cc -O2 -Wall -DVERSION=\"1.2.9\" -g    -c -o mem.o mem.c
cc -O2 -Wall -DVERSION=\"1.2.9\" -g    -c -o http.o http.c
cc -O2 -Wall -DVERSION=\"1.2.9\" -g    -c -o io.o io.c
cc -O2 -Wall -DVERSION=\"1.2.9\" -g    -c -o str.o str.c
cc -O2 -Wall -DVERSION=\"1.2.9\" -g    -c -o error.o error.c
str.c:22: warning: conflicting types for built-in function 'strndup'
cc -O2 -Wall -DVERSION=\"1.2.9\" -g    -c -o utils.o utils.c
cc -O2 -Wall -DVERSION=\"1.2.9\" -g    -c -o main.o main.c
cc -O2 -Wall -DVERSION=\"1.2.9\" -g    -c -o tcp.o tcp.c
cc -O2 -Wall -DVERSION=\"1.2.9\" -g    -c -o mssl.o mssl.c
cc -O2 -Wall -DVERSION=\"1.2.9\" -g    -c -o res.o res.c
In file included from http.c:28:


The real fix is to use:
    make %{?_smp_mflags} CFLAGS="%{optflags}" DEBUG=""
Only that in this case the build fails due to something looking like a small
programming error (see the attached log).The presence or absence of
/usr/include/kerberos made no difference in my local build and I do not have
right now the time to dig further.

I also suggest to contact the author and ask for a clarification of the
license. Strictly speaking, everywhere in the source files he speaks about what
we call "GPL+", only the reference on his website is GPLv2.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]