Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 --- Comment #26 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-12-30 03:02:42 EDT --- There are still several issues: SHOULD: - In dkg's %files, you are inconsistently using %name and dpkg. Please only use one of them. I recommend to use dpkg, only. - You are still using %packagename. Please stop it. - The latin1->utf8 transformation of the man-pages should be performed in %build. MUSTFIX: - There is a circular dependency between the dpkg and dpkg-dev, introduced by the perl modules (dpkg can not be installed without dpkg-dev). I see 3 alternatives to work around this issue: a) package the perl modules as separate package (e.g. perl-Dpkg) b) move all perl modules into dpkg c) try to sort out the details of the perl module deps. I for one would choose alternative a). b) is almost equivalent to a), while c) is likely difficult to implement, if possible at all. - Several directories are unowned, e.g. /etc/dpkg/origins /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Dpkg/Source /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Dpkg/Shlibs - Files below %{_mandir} automatically receive %doc => the %doc inside of your %lang(xx) %doc %{_mandir} ... lists are superfluous. Please remove them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review