Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-emf - Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) Eclipse plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477870 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-emf - Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) Eclipse plugin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ReportedBy: fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx QAContact: extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx CC: notting@xxxxxxxxxx, fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora I want to un-retire then Eclipse EMF package so we can get webtools and datatools and other nice goodies into Fedora. It's effectively a new package though since the eclipse-emf directory in CVS is empty and it hasn't been in the last few releases of Fedora. Spec URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/eclipse-emf.spec SRPM URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/eclipse-emf-2.4.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: The Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) allows developers to build tools and other applications based on a structured data model. From a model specification described in XMI, EMF provides tools and runtime support to produce a set of Java classes for the model, along with a set of adapter classes that enable viewing and command-based editing of the model, and a basic editor. Notes: - Because of changes to Eclipse between F9 and F10, this package will probably only build on F10+. - AOT compilation is disabled due to bug #477707. - The patches included in this package are to get it to build in our environment (mostly to do with javadoc generation), no actual code has been changed from upstream. - It's probably also worth discussing the fact that the SDO sub-packages will disappear in the next major release, which will be for the Eclipse 3.5 coordinated release. I thought about maybe bundling SDO into the main EMF packages so that no-one ends up depending on a package that will be retired next year. (Or perhaps not packaging it at all for this release.) I'd be grateful for thoughts and opinions on this. Thanks for your time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review