Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #38 from Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> 2008-12-22 06:51:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #37) > Ok thank you very much that looks very useful: it is quite a bit change to our > packaging so I think I would like to leave the automatic dependency scripts for > the next update of the guidelines after this one, if that is ok - that will > give us a bit more time to test and play with them. Sure. > Presumbly ghc should own those scripts? Yes or maybe better in a separate small package that is required by ghc to make it easier to update them. > > I am not yet sure, what the impact of > > %define _use_internal_dependency_generator 0 > > is for ghc packages. > > Naive question: what would be the consequence of leaving > _use_internal_dependency_generator turned on? Turning off also disables all C > library dependency checking? Anyway from what you say we can tweak the scripts > to do the write thing. If it is turned on, then __find_requires is not used. According to this https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/FilteringAutomaticDependencies instead of rpmdeps maybe /usr/lib/rpm/find-requires should be used. I will ask about this on fedora-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review