Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178904 jpmahowald@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|caillon@xxxxxxxxxx |jpmahowald@xxxxxxxxx OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald@xxxxxxxxx 2006-08-03 22:07 EST ------- + sources match + GPL'd + builds in mock, FC5 x86_64 + no missing BRs + devel package for .pc + spec readable + locales handled by %find_lang + .desktop file + proper scriptlets + runs, builds Hello World. + permissions OK + file ownerships OK rpmlint: W: monodevelop strange-permission monodevelop.spec 0666 Ignore. E: monodevelop hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib E: monodevelop hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/pkgconfig/:%{_datadir}/pkgconfig/:$PKG_CONFIG_PATH Both needed for libdir hack. E: monodevelop no-binary E: monodevelop only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Expected for mono. E: monodevelop-debuginfo empty-debuginfo-package Not much debug info in mono packages. Remove. W: monodevelop-devel no-documentation Ignore. Note that this does not install to %{_libdir} yet APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review