Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitlbee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196591 ------- Additional Comments From michael@xxxxxxxxxxx 2006-08-01 16:22 EST ------- Yes, indeed. However, should OpenSSL be the default if there are alternatives that can be used and when the developers themselves recommend gnutls. Why go the path of legal grey area when there is a prefectly acceptable alternative? The configure scripts don't even detect for OpenSSL! It just assumes you are using OpenSSL if you do not specify gnutls or nss. You still haven't provided a techincal reason to use OpenSSL. "Becuase they did too" isn't really a reason. There is no need for this to depend on OpenSSL, its only blocking FE-LEGAL and holding up the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review