[Bug 196591] Review Request: bitlbee

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: bitlbee


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196591





------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxxxx  2006-08-01 14:04 EST -------
Well, I still can't see why I should depend on gnutls when openssl is available 
per default. As from my understanding a bitlbee binary linking to openssl is not 
more or less probably illegal rather a wget binary linking to openssl (there are 
many examples more, just try a rpm -e --test openssl). Also said, bitlbee and 
wget are both licensed under GNU GPL and I absolutely can't see any difference 
between them. Or did Red Hat do some probably illegal things for Fedora Core?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]