[Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: jokosher


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029





------- Additional Comments From snecklifter@xxxxxxxxx  2006-07-27 19:09 EST -------
(In reply to comment #18)
Hello Paul,

> Change the license to GPL with exceptions

Done!

> 
> The dbus version comes back with
> 
> (0, 51, 0)

Hmmm, same here. Can you give the output from

rpm -qa | grep -i python

- we are continuing to investigate.
> 
> Can you please upload a new spec and src rpm for review?

Okay, its at:

http://www.iammetal.co.uk/jokosher.spec
http://www.iammetal.co.uk/jokosher-0.1-4.src.rpm

Regards
Chris

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]