[Bug 196529] Review Request: gtkdatabox

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gtkdatabox


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196529





------- Additional Comments From cweyl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2006-07-27 00:59 EST -------
While the "no-docs" rpmlint warning is normally ignorable, given that there
doesn't appear to be any other documentation available, please include
examples/*.c in -devel under %doc.

Also, given that there is a shared library in the system path in -devel, you
need to put in place the %post/%postun scriptlets that are in place for the
main package.

+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license field matches the actual license.
+ license is open source-compatible.  (LGPL) License text included in package.
+ source files match upstream:
847d59ea06ef92426b0911785a5f0c8c  gtkdatabox-0.5.3.0.tar.gz
847d59ea06ef92426b0911785a5f0c8c  gtkdatabox-0.5.3.0.tar.gz.srpm
+ latest version is being packaged.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ package builds in mock (x86_64: fc5 & devel).
X rpmlint is silent
+ Final provides/requires are sane.
** gtkdatabox-0.5.3.0-1.fc5.x86_64.rpm
== rpmlint
== provides
libgtkdatabox-0.5.3.so.0()(64bit)
gtkdatabox = 0.5.3.0-1.fc5
== requires
/sbin/ldconfig
/sbin/ldconfig
libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
libc.so.6()(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
libcairo.so.2()(64bit)
libdl.so.2()(64bit)
libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libm.so.6()(64bit)
libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
** gtkdatabox-debuginfo-0.5.3.0-1.fc5.x86_64.rpm
== rpmlint
== provides
libgtkdatabox-0.5.3.so.0.0.0.debug()(64bit)
gtkdatabox-debuginfo = 0.5.3.0-1.fc5
== requires
** gtkdatabox-devel-0.5.3.0-1.fc5.x86_64.rpm
== rpmlint
W: gtkdatabox-devel no-documentation
== provides
gtkdatabox-devel = 0.5.3.0-1.fc5
== requires
gtk2-devel
gtkdatabox = 0.5.3.0-1.fc5
pkgconfig

X shared libraries are present: proper %post/%postun in place for main package
but not -devel.
+ package is not relocatable.
+ owns the directories it creates.
+ doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ %clean is present.
O %check is not present; package has no tests suite
X proper scriptlets present (%post/%postun for -devel).
+ code, not content.
+ documentation is (will be) small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
+ %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
+ no headers in main package.
+ no pkgconfig files in main package.
+ -devel properly requires main package.
+ no libtool .la droppings.
+ not a GUI app.
+ not a web app.



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]