Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eric: Python IDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186919 tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2006-07-27 00:04 EST ------- Everything's looking good now. Did you see the fix to gen_sip_api.py that came out July 11? You can probably remove the comment with the link to the PyQt-qscintilla review. I'm not sure about this; does PYTHONOPTIMIZE do the opposite of what I think it does? # generate .pyo files? No, for now, it's fast enough as-is. -- Rex PYTHONOPTIMIZE=1; export PYTHONOPTIMIZE rpmlint is complaining about spaces and tabs: W: eric mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs Seems to be on the Name, Group, URL and Source lines. Not an essential fix IMO, but should be simple to fix. * source files match upstream: 2d2c4f85787b34671c76dea1436da8ae eric-3.9.0.tar.gz fcea430a92e9d88089d91ce3099db282 gen_python_api_20050605.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * noarch package; no debuginfo. X rpmlint complains about mixed spaces and tabs, plus some ignorable warnings. * final provides and requires are sane: eric = 3.9.0-5.fc6 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/env PyQt = 3.16 PyQt-qscintilla python(abi) = 2.4 python-abi = 2.4 * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review