Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cvs2svn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200249 ------- Additional Comments From icon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-07-26 11:06 EST ------- Hey, Paul: You're right, I missed the Group bit -- will modify accordingly. I guess I could change the license to "Modified BSD", even though the modification is small: * 3. The end-user documentation included with the redistribution, if * any, must include the following acknowledgment: "This product includes * software developed by CollabNet (http://www.Collab.Net/)." * Alternately, this acknowledgment may appear in the software itself, if * and wherever such third-party acknowledgments normally appear. It's somewhere between the original BSD and current BSD -- the dreaded "advertise clause" is required, but only in documentation, so it's not a big deal. Like I said, the subversion package in core lists the license as "BSD", so I figure it's safe to leave it as just "BSD" for this one as well. Full license text: http://cvs2svn.tigris.org/project_license.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review