[Bug 198247] Review Request: libpng10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libpng10


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198247





------- Additional Comments From paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx  2006-07-26 02:56 EST -------
I'd love to use the configure script. However, I can't find any way to tweak it
to get it to produce the right soname. For instance, the libpng10-1.0.18 package
in FC5 has libpng.so.2.1.0.18; it follows that this libpng10-1.0.20 package
should have libpng.so.2.1.0.20 for compatibility (which is the main reason for
the existence of this package) but I can't get the configure script, or more
exactly, libtool, to generate an object with that soname.

I think the configure script output could be useful though, as it should produce
the correct set of defines to be used when building the package using the older
Makefiles.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]