Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199941 Summary: Review Request: gnome-python2-gda Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ReportedBy: denis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx QAContact: fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx Spec URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/gnome-python2-gda.spec SRPM URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/gnome-python2-gda-2.14.0-1.src.rpm Description: pyGNOME Python extension module for interacting with gda This module should be part of the gnome-python2-extras package, which is in Core. However since libgda (the Gnome database accesslib) is in Extras, the gda module is not enabled in Core. The goal of this package is to provide that missing gda module, which is needed by Glom. I do think the better solution would be for the stable tree of libgda to be part of Fedora Core, but one has to choose one's battles. You'll notice some devel-type files are present in the package, which rpmlint will complain about. The spec tries to be consistent with that of gnome-python2-extras in Core, and considering the small size of the package I don't think the devel split is worth the effort. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review