Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: BackupPC - high-performance backup system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199573 ------- Additional Comments From mark.nospamplease@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-07-23 22:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Spec: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/BackupPC/BackupPC.spec > SRPM: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/BackupPC/BackupPC-2.1.2-4.src.rpm Do you mean 2.1.2-5? > > - Added upstream patch Thanks :) > > try using > http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/perl-File-RsyncP/perl-File-RsyncP-0.62-2.src.rpm > Its actually been approved and built. You should be able to yum it soon. Builds for me :) > > SSH keys - I find it best not to tell admins how their security should be done. > Especially since BackupPC supports so many different methods for backup. > Having said that it might not be a bad idea to at least point them to the > BackupPC documentation for setting up ssh keys. Agreed. I guess my point is: - The package defaults to rsync over ssh. - The official BackupPC docs describe a procedure for setting up ssh that won't work if the backuppc user does not have a shell. Again, not really sure if you should do anything about this... Hopefully most users will figure it out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review