Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-IRC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198882 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-07-22 00:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > Now I'm really confused. He's currently using exactly what you told him to use Does he? It's not how I read https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198882#11 > (modulo one underscore, which is probably a typo) and you're still complaining. The "__" is what makes the difference. _with_xxx defines are automatically/implicitly set by --with xxx __with_xxx is a custom define. > So what are you proposing that he use now? MUST: _with_xxx This implies supporting --with and renders all the custom "--define '__with_xxx 1' superflous. May-be the problem is understanding the meaning of --with/--without. Basically all --with/--without does, is to implicitly %define _with_xxx 1 rsp. %define _without_xxx 1 i.e. the "_with" (one underscore) vs. "__with" (two underscores) is the essential point here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review