Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ------- Additional Comments From toshio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-07-21 19:37 EST ------- * Should get rid of the static libraries as well. Comment #17: >> E: pulseaudio-utils invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libpulsedsp.so libpulsedsp.so >> but unfortunately I'm not entirely sure how to fix it. > > It's not a "real" lib, so it has no use for versioning. It's the active part of > an LD_PRELOAD hack to provide OSS emulation. As such, the error is incorrect > and the lib is just fine. libesddsp and libartsdsp are versioned:: $ objdump -p /usr/lib64/libartsdsp.so /usr/lib64/libesddsp.so.0|grep SONAME SONAME libartsdsp.so.0 SONAME libesddsp.so.0 I don't know how these libraries do their tricks, but is there any improbable case when you might want to have it versioned? The kernel upgrades what it expects to receive on /dev/dsp and you want to provide both the older interface and newer interface to programs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review