[Bug 198691] Review Request: steghide - A Steganography Program

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: steghide - A Steganography Program


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198691


cweyl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From cweyl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2006-07-21 00:04 EST -------
Parag:

Good first pass at a review.  Note that compiler warnings like that are
generally disregarded for the purposes of review, unless it's something
_serious_ or correctable on our end.  But, that being said, when in doubt, note it.

The MUSTs are good places to start for reviews, as you've discovered...  I
encourage you to look at the other templates people are using (or patently
stealing, like me <grin>).  Keep it up, you're improving each time around.

Jochen:

I'd recommend addressing the rpmlint warning below as it's a lot of visual
spam otherwise, but it's not a blocker.

+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license field matches the actual license.
+ license is open source-compatible.  License text included in package.
+ source files match upstream:
 5be490e24807d921045780fd8cc446b3  steghide-0.5.1.tar.gz
 5be490e24807d921045780fd8cc446b3  steghide-0.5.1.tar.gz.srpm
+ latest version is being packaged.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ package builds in mock (5+devel/x86_64).
+ rpmlint is silent on binary package
O rpmlint issues warming on source package (ignorable)
W: steghide setup-not-quiet
+ final provides and requires are sane:
 steghide-0.5.1-1.fc5.x86_64.rpm
 == provides
 steghide = 0.5.1-1.fc5
 == requires
 libc.so.6()(64bit)
 libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
 libjpeg.so.62()(64bit)
 libm.so.6()(64bit)
 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
 libmcrypt.so.4()(64bit)
 libmhash.so.2()(64bit)
 libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.1)(64bit)
 libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit)
 libz.so.1()(64bit)
+ no shared libraries are present.
+ package is not relocatable.
+ owns the directories it creates.
+ doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ %clean is present.
+ %check is present and all tests pass:
+ no scriptlets present.
+ code, not content.
+ documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
+ %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
+ no headers.
+ no pkgconfig files.
+ no libtool .la droppings.
+ not a GUI app.
+ not a web app.

APPROVED


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]