Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-eperl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199028 steve@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve@xxxxxxxxx 2006-07-20 17:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > I struggled with the naming a bit, as eperl is more than just a perl module. > However, it is indeed a module "and then some", which I believe makes it > appropriate to prefix "perl-". The website and documentation also switch from > "ePerl" to "eperl" fairly frequently, so I defer to the packager. I was going for perl-$CPAN_name (even though is isn't on CPAN). It's as appropriate as anything... It's been imported into CVS, branches have been created, and builds have been requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review