Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aplus-fsf - Advanced APL Interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174021 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2006-07-19 19:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > > Jochen, do you think it would be reasonable to back out of this mess by just > > adding a dependency on xterm? > > No. With the latest libXt package, there is no problem anymore. If your > package contains an app-defaults file, then it must also have software which > links to libXm, libXaw, or libXt directly, the first two of which are linked > also to libXt. This package does not have software which is linked to any of those libraries. It drops in an alternate app-default file that xterm can use to set up the proper APL key bindings, but it doesn't actually use the app-default file itself. This is why I suggested the dependency on xterm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review