Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpng10 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198247 michael@xxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |michael@xxxxxxxxxxx OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From michael@xxxxxxxxxxx 2006-07-19 17:41 EST ------- Hi, I will review this one for you. Review for release 1: * RPM name is OK * Source libpng-1.0.20.tar.bz2 is the same as upstream * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint of libpng10 looks OK * rpmlint of libpng10-devel looks OK * File list of libpng10 looks OK * File list of libpng10-devel looks OK Notes: Looks good. I am happy, consider it APPROVED. Please remember to close the bug report once this has been imported into CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review